Barr Says Trump’s Personal Counsel Saw Mueller Report EARLY And It Was Completely LAWFUL

Barr Says Trump's Personal Counsel Saw Mueller Report EARLY And It Was Completely LAWFUL 1

President Donald Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr were both accused of collusion by MSNBC’s Chuck Todd when it surfaced that Trump’s personal counsel read a final version of the redacted special counsel report before it was publicly released. Barr told reporters Thursday it was completely lawful.

“Earlier this week, the president’s personal counsel requested and were given the opportunity to read a final version of the redacted report before it was publicly released,” Barr said. “That request was consistent with the practice followed under the Ethics in Government Act, which permitted individuals named in a report prepared by an Independent Counsel the opportunity to read the report before publication.”

Advertisement

“The president’s personal lawyers were not permitted to make, and did not request any redactions,” he added.

The Ethics in Government Act was passed in 1978 following the Nixon Watergate scandal and the Saturday Night Massacre.

The president’s personal lawyers were not permitted to make, and did not request any redactions…

The New York Times reported Wednesday that the Justice Department had “numerous conversations with White House lawyers about the conclusions made by Mr. Mueller, the special counsel, in recent days, according to people with knowledge of the discussions. The talks have aided the president’s legal team as it prepares a rebuttal to the report and strategizes for the coming public war over its findings.”

Todd referenced the piece on his show Wednesday without mentioning the Ethics in Government Act and tore into the White House and Barr.

Advertisement

“I don’t know what you want to call it. Shamelessness, hubris, whatever it is,” Todd said. “But the fact that had any Democrat tried anything like this, the impeachment hearings would be––I mean, when Barack Obama on 60 Minutes said, ‘You know, these emails… it doesn’t look like there’s much there-there.’ ‘Oh, my God. He can’t speak about a criminal investigation,’” he said.

Todd continued, “Where are all of these House Republicans now that were so up in arms about the president talking about Hillary Clinton’s emails when what you have here, the attorney general briefing the President of the United States on a case that involves the President of the United States. What is the difference?”

Barr also offered a bi-partisan group of leaders from several Congressional committees a version of the report with all the redactions removed except those relating to grand-jury information. “Thus, these members of Congress will be able to see all of the redacted material for themselves – with the limited exception of that which, by law, cannot be shared,” he said.